The NCSA Computational Structural/Solid Mechanics (CSM) group provides modeling
and simulation (M&S) support to Air Force groups at Wright-Patterson Air
Force Base near Dayton, Ohio. These groups are interested in all aspects of
aircraft survivability. Support from the CSM group ranges from providing
mentoring and training to engineers and researchers in the survivability
community to performing M&S work on specific aircraft and possible threats
to these aircraft.
In order to accurately predict how an aircraft will react to a threat, CSM
researchers use state-of-the-art software to capture the important physics of
encounters between aircrafts and airborne threats, such as anti-aircraft
artillary, surface-to-air, and air-to-air missiles. Generally, scenarios that
are simulated by CSM researchers consist of threat systems impacting,
penetrating, and detonating in or near aircraft structural components. In these
encounters, the structure of an aircraft is likely to be significantly damaged
as the threat imposes stresses that are far greater than the structure can
withstand.
CSM researchers use a number of software packages and are developing others,
which capture the necessary physics to simulate these encounters. The group
presently uses the LSDYNA3D, MSC/DYTRAN, and CTH codes for this M&S work.
These are explicit time integrating dynamic finite element codes, which
incorporate appropriate contact algorithms and failure criteria and have been
validated by comparisons with experimental data.
As an example of the type of problem of interest to the survivability community,
Figure 1 shows a generic cylindrical projectile approaching a flat plate at a
fairly shallow angle and high velocity. The projectile is modeled with solid and
shell elements having different material properties and thicknesses. Figure 2
shows the projectile 1.54 milliseconds after impact. Note that the plate, as well
as some of the projectile structures, have failed and broken up. Figure 3 shows a
closeup of this event with color stress contours superimposed on the model.
 |
| Figure 1. Generic Cylindrical Projectile Approaching a Steel Plate |
| |
 |
| Figure 2. Generic Cylindrical Projectile 1.54 msec after Impact |
| |
 |
| Figure 3. Close-up of Generic Cylindrical Projectile 1.54 msec after ImpactStress Color Contours Are Shown |
Modeling and simulation of these types of events helps predict test outcomes in
advance and assists in test planning. Once the M&S models are validated
against post-test data, off nominal numerical tests can be run using the models.
For instance, in the example case presented here, a limited number of physical
tests can be run at selected impact velocities and angles of incidence. Then,
numerical tests, done on a supercomputer can be performed at other velocities
and incidence angles to fill in the gaps.
For more information on this type of modeling and simulation, contact Ronald L.
Hinrichsen at (937) 904-5137, or hinricrl@asc.hpc.mil.
![[Up]](feature_aircraft_up.gif)
Access Online | Posted 11-7-2000
|